On 08/13/09 19:58, Daniel Bastos wrote:
>> 	I think you're viewing it as some kind of "forceful" conversion, which
>> it isn't. It's merely handing out fliers (if I read it right). No
>> different from a kid handing out fliers saying that nuclear energy is
>> wrong, or whatever.
>
> Your last paragraph sounds good to me. We can talk without an
> intention of persuading, or converting, or whatever is the word you
> would prefer to use. I think we have been doing this right here. I
> have. We're speaking our minds, presenting facts.

	No - that's not quite what I'm saying. When people hand out fliers 
about the dangers of nuclear energy, they *are* trying to 
convert/persuade/whatever. And I'm saying that's OK.


-- 
Doctor to patient: Although it's nothing serious, let's keep an eye on 
it to make sure it doesn't turn into a major lawsuit.

Post a reply to this message