|
 |
On Thu, 13 Aug 2009 16:24:17 -0600, somebody wrote:
> "Jim Henderson" <nos### [at] nospam com> wrote in message
> news:4a847bbd$1@news.povray.org...
>
>> Those in favour of continuing private insurance, in my view, overlook
>> that public health is, by definition, a public concern. If we don't
>> take care of individuals who get sick because they don't have
>> insurance, we risk infecting everyone else.
>
> I think people on all sides miss the real issues. Health care doesn't
> magically become better or worse because it's public or private. Health
Agreed.
> care in both USA and Canada stinks, and the latter is public (and
> arguably stinks more, since well to do Canadians rely on USA for their
> timely health care needs). Granted, the private vs public or how much of
> each is a major decision, but the quality is all in the implementation,
> economy, management, logistics... etc.
Absolutely 100% agreed.
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
|
