|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Jim Henderson wrote:
>
> Where he got his interest is irrelevant. We all learn from our families
> and our friends. So what? The reason the kid is exercising his free
> speech is not important. He should be allowed to do so, as long as he's
> not disruptive or inciting people to harm others.
>
True, but I still don't think it's appropriate to attempt to convert
other students to your form of religion, be it atheist, christian,
jewish or muslim. There should be a respect for what others believe. The
administrators of the school felt this overstepped a boundary, religion
is a very touchy issue, and can be considered particularly inflammatory.
I agree with the school's request not to hand out the item directly, but
leave it in a common area for those who are interested to pick it up.
>>>> But I think the parents of the kid who caused the whole thing probably
>>>> would have a problem with an atheist distributing information.
>>>> *That's* where the problem usually starts.
>>> Right...
>> Right. And chances are the problem has nothing to do with religion.
>
> It has *everything* to do with religion. My hypothesis that the kid's
> parents would be up in arms over an atheist distributing information
> about atheism was put forth because most people who take these kinds of
> actions seem to think "free speech" only applies to the things and ideals
> they hold, not to everyone.
Exactly!
Interestingly enough, the candy cane was NOT intended to be a religious
symbol:
http://www.snopes.com/holidays/christmas/candycane.asp
> So it becomes a matter of "those are not MY beliefs, so the speech should
> be suppressed" or even "those are not the beliefs of the majority, so the
> speech should be suppressed".
--
~Mike
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |