|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
clipka wrote:
>
> So you think 10s less is a big win? Then dig this - Core i7 Quad 920,
Nah, I was surprised that it was so close though. The 1m57s time seemed
really fast.
> 2.67 GHz (probably running at 2.8 GHz though, too):
>
> 1m 15s !!
>
> Gee, I guess I love this machine :P
Yep, the i7's are speedy little beasts, from what I've seen. Does
hyperthreading help at all?
--
~Mike
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |