clipka wrote:

> 
> So you think 10s less is a big win? Then dig this - Core i7 Quad 920, 

Nah, I was surprised that it was so close though. The 1m57s time seemed 
really fast.

> 2.67 GHz (probably running at 2.8 GHz though, too):
> 
>     1m 15s !!
> 
> Gee, I guess I love this machine :P

Yep, the i7's are speedy little beasts, from what I've seen. Does 
hyperthreading help at all?

-- 
~Mike

Post a reply to this message