In article <4A8### [at] hotmailcom>,
andrel wrote:

> On 11-8-2009 18:38, Warp wrote:
>> Invisible <voi### [at] devnull> wrote:
>>> So we're _not_ going to use this feature. Why? Because the people at HQ 
>>> don't use this feature.
>> 
>>   What happens if you use it anyways?
>> 
> Indeed, my advise would be to find an (obscure) british rule about 
> quality control that could be interpreted to the effect that the HQ 
> solution being illegal. There may be a rule about using an OS that is 
> unsupported and therefore vulnerable to any new virus that comes out. 
> OSLT. Andy, use your knowledge, you know more about legal requirements 
> than HQ.

That's good thinking. One could actually find in the law the support
needed to defend oneself from corporative despotism. I just hope you
can find something in the law... :-)

Also notice this can always get one fired. Disobedience is not at all
praised out there.

Post a reply to this message