andrel wrote:
> Depends on who we are talking about. For myself I reserve 'knowledge' 
> for others 'superstition'. (just like most people)

I can't parse that sentence.

> I know, and I am arguing that you do so because you have the false 
> belief that knowledge is objective.

I never claimed it was objective. Indeed, I asserted the opposite.

-- 
   Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
   "We'd like you to back-port all the changes in 2.0
    back to version 1.0."
   "We've done that already. We call it 2.0."

Post a reply to this message