|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Neeum Zawan wrote:
> As for your complaint, sorry: No sympathies. Of all the mail readers
> I've used, Outlook was the *only* one that did not use a standard format
> for storing emails.
Possibly true for you. Certainly not for others of us.
Solaris mail. GMail. Lotus Notes. Lots of examples.
> There's simply no excuse for it,
Sure there is. They store more than email in the email.
> The "other" solution was to install TB, have it import it, and then
> just take the files from TB, which, like almost all mail readers, stores
> stuff in a sane format.
Not that I'm arguing those other formats are *better*. But there are reasons
for them to be non-standard.
--
Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
"We'd like you to back-port all the changes in 2.0
back to version 1.0."
"We've done that already. We call it 2.0."
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |