andrel wrote:
> Only from the perspective of an outsider. Knowledge is not objective, I 
> understand why you would like it to be so, but alas...

Well, we're kind of debating over the meaning of the word. What's the 
objective word *you* would use for justified true belief?

> Which would not stop some people from knowing they had been abducted, 
> even if you would insist they mere believe it.

OK. I'm just objecting to the use of that word to mean that you can know 
something which you are justified in believing is false.

-- 
   Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
   "We'd like you to back-port all the changes in 2.0
    back to version 1.0."
   "We've done that already. We call it 2.0."

Post a reply to this message