On 08/03/09 21:24, Chambers wrote:
> Neeum Zawan wrote:
>> On 08/02/09 22:57, Chambers wrote:
>>> I've seen interviews with several people from his staff who talked of
>>> the pressure exerted on them to present information that fit in with the
>>> higher-up's views (though it's not clear if the pressure came from Bush
>>> himself, or if Cheney was trying to keep him misinformed).
>>
>> Oh sure. However, that doesn't translate to "deluded".
>
> OK, then, maybe "deluded" is a bit strong. "Misinformed," perhaps? Or
> even just "biased?"

	I have to disagree. He/they weren't insisting that intelligence reports 
say what they wanted them to say so that they could 
misinform/bias/delude themselves, but so that they could 
misinform/delude the public.

-- 
On a Taxidermist's window:
"We really know our stuff."

Post a reply to this message