On 08/03/09 21:21, Chambers wrote:
> That, at some point, you have to make a decision about who gets which
> treatments, taking into consideration all the relevant factors (age,
> other conditions, likelihood of success, and cost). Excluding any one of
> those factors - even cost - would be irresponsible.
>
> Once you admit that there's a cutoff point somewhere, then it no longer
> becomes a question of whether or not certain people will be denied
> treatment, but only a question of where that cutoff point is.

	So, what's the cutoff point in Canada, the UK, and France? Citations 
should be included.

	And, BTW, are you suggesting that insurance companies don't emulate 
cutoff points?


-- 
On a Taxidermist's window:
"We really know our stuff."

Post a reply to this message