David H. Burns wrote:
> Currently they do not seem to be involved in this discussion. Are you 
> simply quoting
> them and don't know what they mean. 

I know what *I* mean. You're the one disputing whether the terms means what 
I say they mean.

Just so you know, falling back on the "every single word in the entire 
discussion has to be extensively and precisely defined, even tho all 
participants already know what it means" is an old and foolish debating trick.

If you don't know what it means, why are you expressing disapproval and disgust?

-- 
   Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
   "We'd like you to back-port all the changes in 2.0
    back to version 1.0."
   "We've done that already. We call it 2.0."

Post a reply to this message