Thomas de Groot wrote:
> Very entertaining and proposing an interesting view on the nature of God.

I found these to be tedious and silly, myself. It wasn't an interesting view 
on the nature of God, IMO. There was still all the unexplained supernatural 
nonsense with a token toss of "science" into the mix.

-- 
   Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
   "We'd like you to back-port all the changes in 2.0
    back to version 1.0."
   "We've done that already. We call it 2.0."

Post a reply to this message