Neeum Zawan wrote:
>     I really doubt that grammar rules suggest this. 

It's definitely grammar rules, yes.

>     In any case, it's a matter of interpretation. His usage of quotation 
> marks for 'physically' is strictly to point out that he's using the same 
> words as the opposing side (i.e. that it is not merely his 
> interpretation). In one sense, that is close to the ideal usage.

If that's what he meant. But since he put "do" in quote marks too, I somehow 
think he's using the same conventions he uses in every other post, which is 
to incorrectly put quote marks around words he's trying to emphasize.

-- 
   Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
   "We'd like you to back-port all the changes in 2.0
    back to version 1.0."
   "We've done that already. We call it 2.0."

Post a reply to this message