|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
clipka wrote:
> "David H. Burns" <dhb### [at] cherokeetel net> wrote:
>> Unfortunately, "fundamentalist" is one of those terms much abused by the
>> media.
>> It ought to mean something like "believing or adhering to the
>> fundamentals of",
>> whereas, it has come to mean something like "one ready to exercise violence
>> against those who disagree with his beliefs"
>
> That's what I'd call "radical" (though they're typically also fundamentalists).
"Radical" is another media buzz-word that has come to have little
descriptive
meaning.
>
>> For instance, the essential difference between Christianity and Judaism
>> is the acceptance of Jesus as divine.
>
> A bit more than that, to all I know; Judaism does not even acknowledge Jesus as
> a prophet (which, for instance, Islam does).
I think you are right, but they could accept him as a prophet
misunderstood or misrepresented
by the christians with little or no change in their beliefs.
> There's also strong dissent about the position whether the Mosaic rituals are
> still binding; Jews are obviously convinced that this was the case, and even
> many of the earliest Christians (who were Jews after all) seem to have
> continued, and partially even insisted on, this tradition, while Paulus seems
> to have taught otherwise among the Gentile christians (though he also seemed to
> have strongly opposed the position that it was particularly *bad* to follow
> those old rituals). And the thing is of course complicated further by various
> christian sub-groups having introduced their own rituals instead (which
> apparently were often adapted versions of older traditions).
I think this is all true.
>
>> A lot that many christians believe about Satan,
>> heaven, angels, etc. is,
>> I think, accumulated tradition. Of course some no doubt regard the who
>> of christian belief as
>> accumulated tradition.
>
> That's a very difficult topic, because a lot can be interpreted into the bible,
> so it's hard to tell which is true christian, and which is heathen tradition
> projected onto biblical terminology and the like.
Also true.
David :)
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |