Warp wrote:
> Invisible <voi### [at] devnull> wrote:
>> More interestingly, it explains *why* people want to believe such 
>> ludicrous claims: for the personal glory.
> 
>   Yeah. If what that article claims is true, the author of the Loose Change
> "documentary" originally didn't even believe in the conspiracy, but simply
> did the first version of the film just for fun and experiment, by deliberately
> picking up certain material and ignoring the rest, just to see how it would
> turn out. Only after he was offered glory and cash was it that he started
> making it a serious attempt at a convincing (and outright deceiving) movie.
> 
>   I suppose he succeeded big time. He got his fame, followers, TV time and
> money.
> 
Example of the "professionals" that do this:

http://swallowingthecamel.blogspot.com/2009/05/ghostbusters-ed-and-lorraine-warren.html
http://swallowingthecamel.blogspot.com/2009/05/ghostbusters-ed-and-lorraine-warren_29.html
http://swallowingthecamel.blogspot.com/2009/06/ghostbusters-part-iii-bs-in-connecticut.html
http://swallowingthecamel.blogspot.com/2009/07/ghostbusters-part-iv-ed-and-lorraine.html

Guys site is dedicated to digging these wackos up, and, when possible, 
dissecting the facts. Got to love this one too, from there (The must be 
putting something in the water, I am sure, but its not the rainbows I am 
worried about. lol):

http://swallowingthecamel.blogspot.com/2009/07/conspiracy-monday-beware-sprinkler.html

-- 
void main () {

     if version = "Vista" {
       call slow_by_half();
       call DRM_everything();
     }
     call functional_code();
   }
   else
     call crash_windows();
}

<A HREF='http://www.daz3d.com/index.php?refid=16130551'>Get 3D Models, 
3D Content, and 3D Software at DAZ3D!</A>

Post a reply to this message