Warp wrote:
>   Of course it's not just that simple, as many of the features of the
> observed universe don't conform to a simplistic Big Bang.

Certainly. And it turns out that there's a fair amount of heat-like energy 
left in a substance at absolute zero, simply due to quantum exclusion and 
such. My point was that "everything was all together" was the original 
motivation of the "big bang", and not "something from nothing."

If we knew what happened in the first 10^-43 seconds, maybe we'd know where 
everything came from, but there's no reason I know of, outside genesis, to 
think there was nothing before there was something.

-- 
   Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
   "We'd like you to back-port all the changes in 2.0
    back to version 1.0."
   "We've done that already. We call it 2.0."

Post a reply to this message