Darren New wrote:
> Sounds like they've reinvented typestate, but I'd have to go dig up my
> other technical books from two decades ago to see if their formulae match.
It sounds interesting and even possibly useful, but... it's
incomprehensible. I can't make much sense out of it. Clearly whoever
wrote this document knows what they mean. Unfortunately they didn't do a
very good job of explaining it! :-P
Post a reply to this message
|