|
|
clipka wrote:
>
> Yes, I personally do advocate going for strong OOP-support with POV-Ray 4 SDL. I
> do so as a POV-Ray user, and I do so as a contributing developer.
>
> Yes, I did present a serious proposal for a new, OOP-enabled SDL in the povray 4
> newsgroup some months ago.
>
> Yes, being active in the development of POV-Ray 3.7 I *may* happen to personally
> get my hands dirty on the code of POV-Ray 4's SDL engine.
>
So it is so after all
:(
Post a reply to this message
|
|