David H. Burns <dhb### [at] cherokeetelnet> wrote:
> Warp wrote:

> >   Do you really think a new programming paradigm would be developed and
> > get widespread if it was *harder* to use than older, ascetic imperative
> > approaches?
> > 
> Yes, (though I have no idea what  "ascetic imperative approaches" means) 
> such things have
>   happened more than once!

  Yeah, sure. I'm now convinced that OOP became so widespread regardless
of being significantly harder than imperative programming.

-- 
                                                          - Warp

Post a reply to this message