Warp wrote:

>   Do you really think a new programming paradigm would be developed and
> get widespread if it was *harder* to use than older, ascetic imperative
> approaches?
> 
Yes, (though I have no idea what  "ascetic imperative approaches" means) 
such things have
  happened more than once! But I've been ruled off topic again --
which is a good thing, it keeps from wasting my time and yours on my 
soapbox. :)

Post a reply to this message