Chambers wrote:

> Why do you associate OOP with .Net?

Needless complexity.
> 
> Did you know that you can program OOP with functional or imperative languages?
> That it's a design philosophy more than a language feature?
Seems to be both.
> 
> Besides, there are already integrated modellers and development environments for
> POV-Ray.  None from MS (yet), but they are there ;)


None from MS and not exclusively from MS. IDE's themselves are great 
tools. We probably need more.

Post a reply to this message