Warp wrote:
>   It doesn't change the fact that Linux is more secure for the average
> user than Windows is, for the simple reason that Linux is not targetted
> as much as Windows is.

I think he's saying the average Linux user isn't the same as the average 
Windows user, and the average Linux's user's machine is more valuable to 
attack. You're just measuring two different ways.

-- 
   Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
   "We'd like you to back-port all the changes in 2.0
    back to version 1.0."
   "We've done that already. We call it 2.0."

Post a reply to this message