clipka <nomail@nomail> wrote:
> Warp <war### [at] tagpovrayorg> wrote:
> >   (And before anyone says anything, no, Windows is not better. Windows is
> > year after year always at the top of the list of most security flaws found
> > during the year.)

> True, but the superiority of Linux crumbles in my eyes, if the responsible
> people brush aside security holes that easily.

  Then the answer is rather simple, isn't it: Don't use Linux.

> And knowing (through obvious proof) that the Linux kernel code isn't checked
> with professional tools

  Define "professional tool".

> I'm not saying "they're worse than Microsoft" - all I'm saying is "they're no
> better".

  That's BS. Basically every time a security hole is found in the linux kernel,
a patch appears in a matter of *hours*.

  How soon do you get security patches for Windows when security flaws are
found? Certainly not within hours. At best within days, at worst within
months (yes, it has happened).

  So yes, the linux community *is* better in security than MS is.

-- 
                                                          - Warp

Post a reply to this message