|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
clipka wrote:
> In case of a basic change of the genetic structure, like a different number of
> chromosomes, this appears quite amazing, because obviously it cannot evolve
> over time so (a) cannot play a role, and (b) seems unlikely due to the dramatic
> proportions of the change.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Down_syndrome
> So intially the 47-chromosome population must have been comparatively
> successful.
Or it's less hard to combine 48 with 46 than you might think. All the data
is there, including the tollermerines (or however you spell it) in the middle.
--
Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
"We'd like you to back-port all the changes in 2.0
back to version 1.0."
"We've done that already. We call it 2.0."
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |