Slime wrote:
> Of course this is a contrived example, but it's probably not too far from a 
> real use case.

Ah, that makes sense. Thank you for clarifying that.

It *is* code generation. Just from the same language you're compiling. That 
didn't occur to me. :-)

-- 
   Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
   "We'd like you to back-port all the changes in 2.0
    back to version 1.0."
   "We've done that already. We call it 2.0."

Post a reply to this message