|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Doctor John wrote:
> At a guess that would be:
> http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/07/17/linux_kernel_exploit/
Yes, but since that wasn't the point of my question and people might
reasonably assume I'm bashing on Linux if I posted a link to it, I thought
I'd omit it. The question was why the compiler felt the need for *that*
optimization in the first place. When would it ever be a good idea?
--
Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
"We'd like you to back-port all the changes in 2.0
back to version 1.0."
"We've done that already. We call it 2.0."
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |