|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Darren New wrote:
> Jim Charter wrote:
>
>> What if the cleaver is in the foreground quite ahead of the beak
>
>
> Even worse, I think. Then it's closer to the camera, and you should be
> seeing even more ceiling. I.e., if it's farther ahead of the beak, it's
> farther *away* from the beak.
>
the scale of the reflection does seem a little suspicious, yes
I know when I am out driving in the city with so many reflective
surfaces around I notice reflections that seem odd. And I realize that
if I had raytraced an image and gotten that same effect I would tend not
to believe the raytracer because normally the selective nature of our
perception would override it. Things like seeing the mechanics of the
underside of a car reflected perfectly in a puddle or reflections within
reflections that you think couldn't possibly happen given the angles
involved.
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |