|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Chambers wrote:
> Darren New wrote:
>> Apparently, now US patents either have to be about how to build
>> something ("transforming one thing into another") or about a specific
>> machine (excluding that which you can build on a general purpose
>> computer).
>
> So, does this rule out software patents?
Define "software patent". I would think so, yes.
--
Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
"We'd like you to back-port all the changes in 2.0
back to version 1.0."
"We've done that already. We call it 2.0."
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |