On Thu, 09 Jul 2009 21:41:37 +0200, andrel wrote:

> On 8-7-2009 21:47, Jim Henderson wrote:
>> On Wed, 08 Jul 2009 12:14:18 -0700, Darren New wrote:
>> 
>>> Jim Henderson wrote:
>>>> But also this whole notion of "traditional marriage" being defended
>>> "Traditional" marriage when I was born didn't include allowing whites
>>> to marry blacks, either, so I'm not sure I *want* to support
>>> "traditional marriage."
>> 
>> Yeah, agreed with that.  It strikes me that those who defend so-called
>> "traditional marriage" don't really know what traditional marriage is.
>> They've co-opted the term to mean "one man and one woman", but that's
>> actually a relatively recent thing when it comes to the history of
>> humanity, from what I've read on the subject.
> 
> There is your problem, you have been reading too much.

Certainly some people thinks so.  There are others who think that we 
think to much, and should just go with *their* gut. ;-)

Jim

Post a reply to this message