>> Actually... I'm not aware of anything else that does what Exchange 
>> does. Which is a little bit odd, really.
> 
> There ya go.

I'd actually be interested in finding such a beast... It seems odd that 
nobody has made one.

>> I know of a few office suites that manage to not constantly crash like 
>> MS Office does. 
> 
>  > Apache is notable for doing the same thing as IIS
> 
> Only in the broad sense that UNIX does the same thing as Windows. They 
> really aren't comparable.

So what does IIS do that Apache doesn't then? (Aside from giving root 
access to anybody who types their URLs with backslashes instead of 
forward slashes...)

>> There are lots of database engines out there; I doubt many of them are 
>> worse than SQL Server.
> 
> You haven't tried MySql then.

OK, so *some* of them are worse. ;-)

> It sounds more like "I don't know the capabilities of Microsoft systems, 
> so I listen to what Linux enthusiasts tell me about it." :-)

What makes you think it's the Linux enthusiasts? I hated M$ long before 
anybody had even heard of Linus Travolds... And I don't buy it when 
people say Linux is the answer. It's too messy and laden with backwards 
compatibility...

Post a reply to this message