Invisible wrote:
> Both also had a nasty habit of the metadata not matching the source 
> code. Like, open a file, add a new method, and VS seems not to "know 
> about it" until you close and reopen VS. (You'd hope that just saving 
> the file would be enough. No. Maybe just compiling it then? No.)

And how long ago was this, and how out of date were the university's 
computers? I was pretty impressed when VS2005 would add intellisense for 
routines I'd typed into other files and *didn't* save yet.

> I imagine on today's computers it's probably not quite so slow, but I 
> doubt it's become any less inflexible.

So, "I don't know what I'm talking about, but I'll guess it's bad." Cool.

-- 
   Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
   "We'd like you to back-port all the changes in 2.0
    back to version 1.0."
   "We've done that already. We call it 2.0."

Post a reply to this message