|
|
Jim Henderson wrote:
> As an interesting side note, it just occurred to me (because you said
> they don't take state funding) that it's ironic that very large segments
> of the membership think that Obama is a socialist (I've heard some at
> work state that they believe that), but they pay their 10% income tithe
> regularly in order to support the Church's outreach programs, to help the
> poor, and to help lower the cost of tuition a their school. It seems
> that that is just a bit more socialist than they claim Obama is.
>
> I hadn't thought about that before this conversation. :-)
>
> Jim
Religious people are never against religious socialism, just secular
government socialism. Why? Because the later they equate with Soviet
Russia, China, North Korea, and other places where "socialist" doesn't
mean, "We all share and share alike", but rather, "You share what I tell
you to, or I shoot you!" Mind... one could argue that this isn't much
different than what churches have done throughout history, or the
political maneuvering they do now, just without the ability to simply
shoot people that disagree. Basically, if the state wanted to give every
child a laptop, that would be bad, because the state is "forcing" them
to receive laptops, and using our money to do it. If the church wanted
to do the same thing, it would be a "good thing (tm)", instead. What
disgusts me is cases where its not a laptop, but, "A few crackers and
some free milk, so that the local poor kids get at least one half assed
meal that isn't from McDonalds." That is also "bad", if the state does
it, instead of a church group. (This literally happened a few years back.)
--
void main () {
If Schrödingers_cat is alive or version > 98 {
if version = "Vista" {
call slow_by_half();
call DRM_everything();
}
call functional_code();
}
else
call crash_windows();
}
<A HREF='http://www.daz3d.com/index.php?refid=16130551'>Get 3D Models,
3D Content, and 3D Software at DAZ3D!</A>
Post a reply to this message
|
|