Darren New wrote:
> Patrick Elliott wrote:
>> If they had honestly been defending marriage 
> 
> Well, it was all BS. I have no idea why "marriage" would need defending. 
> The only threat to anyones marriages were coming *from* the "defense of 
> marriage" amendment.
> 
The same people insist that they believe in an all knowing, all 
powerful, omni-present god, who dictates virtually everything in the 
known universe, and even knows who will sin and not sin, yet ***still*** 
think that **they** need to decide which is the one true faith following 
him, and defend both that faith, and him, from attacks by people that 
simply don't believe in the same things (or in any of it at all). Why 
the hell wouldn't they imagine that "marriage" needed to be similarly 
defended?

-- 
void main () {
   If Schrödingers_cat is alive or version > 98 {
     if version = "Vista" {
       call slow_by_half();
       call DRM_everything();
     }
     call functional_code();
   }
   else
     call crash_windows();
}

<A HREF='http://www.daz3d.com/index.php?refid=16130551'>Get 3D Models, 
3D Content, and 3D Software at DAZ3D!</A>

Post a reply to this message