|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Darren New wrote:
> I disagree. I think most of the people who aren't allowed to marry would
> be happy to actually have all the rights and privileges of a religious
> marriage without the religion.
Then don't you think the two institutions should be separate, if there
is a significant demand for one without the other?
>
>> Then, if gay people wanted to get married, all they would have to do
>> would be to find a church that allows them to.
>
> And I would bet that the first thing that would happen is the religious
> types would try to get that religion somehow declared improper.
Yes, but we at least have a couple hundred years dealing with unpopular
religions. The issue of a religion not being popular but still being
protected from persecution has been mostly sorted out.
--
Chambers
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |