|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Warp wrote:
> I watched the two recent movies, though. Just watched the new one today.
I just watched this. It was both simultaneously awful and highly
entertaining. I fully understand why the critics retched at it and the
general public paid lots of money. :-)
> Every single piece, as connected to the
> rest, does indeed form a part of the vehicle/robot, and moves in a way
> required for the transformation to happen.
Pretty much. It's hard to see on some of the machines with less screen time,
like the sucker-upper machine.
I liked how much personality and realistic movement they managed to put into
them. The panther machine, for example, was quite impressively animated. I'm
surprised they got away with so few animators - I expected more names in the
credits.
> It's this kind of attention to detail which makes me appreciate a movie
> more.
I liked how you could tell which robot was the blender, which was the
garbage disposal, which was the toaster, etc. Very cleverly animated even
for a very short screen appearance.
--
Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
Insanity is a small city on the western
border of the State of Mind.
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |