|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
TC wrote:
> I concur - the Dual Core cannot be twice as fast as a Quadcore - I
> really doubt this.
Well, for a task that only uses 1 thread, a multicore CPU can be slower
than a single core.
But yes, I think this particular data point is erroneous somehow.
> That's my problem (one of many ;-) - to find a reliable source of
> benchmarks. I do not need something telling me how fast Quake runs -
> it's more a function of the graphics-card anyway - I would like to have
> a reliable source showing the performance of the respective CPUs. So I
> tried here - raytracing is a task that consumes CPU power.
On all the benchmarks I've seen on Tom's Hardware, Core 2 is the
architecture to aim for. (Although I'll admit to having not studied Core
i7 too strongly yet. It's still too expensive.)
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |