On 06/28/09 21:57, Darren New wrote:
>> was a bigger problem for digital non-SLR's.
>
> No, it was a problem for cheap digital non-SLRs. For decent digital
> non-SLRs, they solve it the same way.

	I know. What I meant was that the actual noise was worse in digital 
non-SLR's (assuming you don't do frame subtraction on either). With some 
good digital SLR's, you don't get too much noise for equivalent 
exposures even if you disable dark frame subtraction.

	As for higher ISO noise, I don't know from personal experience - I was 
just repeating what I've read. I was not into photography when I had a 
film camera, and probably all my film was ISO 100.


-- 
"I think not," said Descartes, and promptly disappeared.


                     /\  /\               /\  /
                    /  \/  \ u e e n     /  \/  a w a z
                        >>>>>>mue### [at] nawazorg<<<<<<
                                    anl

Post a reply to this message