somebody <x### [at] ycom> wrote:
> The court may come to completely different conclusions if a partner in sex
> is 17.9 years as opposed to 18.1 years old. To me, that's more or less
> meaningless, and I have a much more smooth judegement curve, which takes
> into account the age differential between the partners.

  You mean if a 45-yo has sex with a 18.1-yo, that's ok, but if he has
sex with a 17.9-yo, that's not ok?

-- 
                                                          - Warp

Post a reply to this message