On 06/25/09 13:04, Warp wrote:
> How about patents which require fictional laws of physics in order to
> work? http://www.freepatentsonline.com/6960975.html
Made my day.
Am I missing something? I thought for something to be patented, you
need a working model. Did that change? And what would be the rationale
of not requiring it?
--
Marge: "When I married you, I knew we wouldn't live in luxury."
Homer: "And I kept that vow."
/\ /\ /\ /
/ \/ \ u e e n / \/ a w a z
>>>>>>mue### [at] nawaz org<<<<<<
anl
Post a reply to this message
|