On 06/25/09 13:04, Warp wrote:
>    How about patents which require fictional laws of physics in order to
> work? http://www.freepatentsonline.com/6960975.html

	Made my day.

	Am I missing something? I thought for something to be patented, you 
need a working model. Did that change? And what would be the rationale 
of not requiring it?

-- 
Marge: "When I married you, I knew we wouldn't live in luxury."
Homer: "And I kept that vow."


                     /\  /\               /\  /
                    /  \/  \ u e e n     /  \/  a w a z
                        >>>>>>mue### [at] nawazorg<<<<<<
                                    anl

Post a reply to this message