|
|
>> So, technically you could argue that you're using LZW not to compress,
>> but to obfuscate your data? A slight compression being just a
>> side-effect :-)
>
> Yes, exactly. If, for example, the steps you follow to do LZW
> compression was one step of an encryption algorithm, it wouldn't be
> encumbered by the patent.
>
> If you're not compressing data with it, it's not patented. Just like if
> you're not encryption data, modular exponentiation isn't patented.
Except that, of course, all of this is nonesense. In reality, as soon as
you dare to *touch* LZW, the lawers will say "hey, that's patented", and
threated to sue you off the face of the Earth. The fact that technically
you haven't infringed anything is irrelevant. FUD.
--
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
Post a reply to this message
|
|