|
|
Darren New a écrit :
> Warp wrote:
>> Darren New <dne### [at] sanrrcom> wrote:
>>> In the US, for many years (and probably still now) mathematical
>>> algorithms cannot be patented.
>>
>> You mean eg. LZW is not a mathematical algorithm?
>
> The operations it does are mathematical. *Using it for compression* is
> what's patented. Not actually running the algorithm, but running the
> algorithm with the intent to compress the data.
>
So, technically you could argue that you're using LZW not to compress,
but to obfuscate your data? A slight compression being just a
side-effect :-)
--
Vincent
Post a reply to this message
|
|