On Sun, 21 Jun 2009 23:34:15 -0500, Mueen Nawaz wrote:

> On 06/21/09 22:32, John VanSickle wrote:
>> That, and the rather safe conclusion that people who are willing to
>> break laws about WMD are not likely to give a rat's about their iTunes
>> EULA.
> 
> 	Well, more seriously, it may be about covering Apple's rear end 
rather
> than preventing the user from doing something.

Absolutely, but it's quite funny that the law requires Apple put such 
verbiage in the EULA when it's pretty well known that those organisations 
who would use the technology for nefarious purposes won't be deterred by 
a bunch of legalese.

I'm sure Bin Laden wouldn't read over the EULA and go "curses, foiled 
again!" upon seeing that iTunes can't be used for creating death and 
destruction.

Jim

Post a reply to this message