somebody <x### [at] ycom> wrote:
> The CNN got the story all wrong, the trial was not for stealing/downloading
> but for sharing. Read the second link posted, which does a much better job
> explaining the case.

  She would have to have shared to 2 million people in order for the damages
to be proportional to the fine.

  (And no, "those people who downloaded it shared it further" is not a valid
argument. You can't sue one person for the crime made by another person.)

-- 
                                                          - Warp

Post a reply to this message