|
|
"Thomas de Groot" <tDOTdegroot@interDOTnlANOTHERDOTnet> wrote in message
news:4a37676f@news.povray.org...
> I must admit that if the main(?) focus of the IRTC is the technical focus,
> then I sadly loose interest. I thought that the IRTC was a platform to
> create (and show) beautiful images through ray-tracing, whatever the
> technical background.
I quite agree, I wasn't trying to argue for a more technical focus, I was
just pointing out that the unique combination of rules (which are mostly
technical in nature) is the reason the IRTC has attracted it's particular
fan-base, and that any change (towards less rules, or for that matter more
rules) will make it something us IRTC devotees are less interested in.
Now, if at some future point the IRTC community were to be dwindling and the
project seemed like it was only appealing to an ever smaller group of
fanatics, then perhaps some adjustment would be justified. But I think this
new IRTC should be given a fair chance before anyone goes changing the
rules.
--
Tek
http://evilsuperbrain.com
Post a reply to this message
|
|