"Jim Henderson" <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote in message
news:4a328c16$1@news.povray.org...
> On Thu, 11 Jun 2009 17:46:34 -0600, somebody wrote:
> > "Jim Henderson" <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote in message

> > Interesting way to not hold a discussion <g>. In light of present
> > evidence of three posts since you stated your inflexibility for further
> > discussion, I propose that we do not place too much stock in stated
> > inflexibilities.

> So then are you saying that you're open to being convinced that there is
> a flaw in your reasoning?

I'm not exactly sure what you are saying, but naturally, my reasoning is of
perfect. It's up to you to show that it is not.

> > Then again, maybe the goal was simply to derail the
> > original discussion....

> My intent was simply to state an opinion.  You've made it abundantly
> clear that you're not open to changing your mind on this topic, so
> further discussion with you about why I think you're wrong is pretty
> pointless.

Whether I am willing or not to change my mind has no bearing on the validity
of any arguments I make.

Post a reply to this message