Jim Henderson wrote:
> I wouldn't know, I suppose you could, for example, in a religious 
> institution require that workers there need to be members, but I'm not 
> sure how that applies to an organization like this.

That was kind of what I was talking about. Nobody seems to think it's silly 
to let a church require religious people to fill particular roles. But if 
you ask the same thing about a "nasty" group that's just as protected under 
US law, I can see people getting bent out of shape.

-- 
   Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
   There's no CD like OCD, there's no CD I knoooow!

Post a reply to this message