|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Jim Henderson wrote:
> I wouldn't know, I suppose you could, for example, in a religious
> institution require that workers there need to be members, but I'm not
> sure how that applies to an organization like this.
That was kind of what I was talking about. Nobody seems to think it's silly
to let a church require religious people to fill particular roles. But if
you ask the same thing about a "nasty" group that's just as protected under
US law, I can see people getting bent out of shape.
--
Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
There's no CD like OCD, there's no CD I knoooow!
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |