On Mon, 08 Jun 2009 13:15:01 -0500, Mike Raiford wrote:

> Jim Henderson wrote:
> 
>> Well, they probably are considered some sort of non-profit organization
>> (IIRC, they are considered a fraternal organization with officers), but
>> I think they would be required by law to have an employer ID number if
>> they paid their officers a salary.
> 
> Would it be legal to stipulate that employees may only be a member if
> their "group?"

I wouldn't know, I suppose you could, for example, in a religious 
institution require that workers there need to be members, but I'm not 
sure how that applies to an organization like this.

Jim

Post a reply to this message