"andrel" <a_l### [at] hotmailcom> wrote in message
news:4A2### [at] hotmailcom...
> On 6-6-2009 23:46, Stephen wrote:
> > On Sat, 06 Jun 2009 23:06:18 +0200, andrel <a_l### [at] hotmailcom>
wrote:

> >> I always say that a discussion between two
> >
> > If Warp had not posted, there would have been at least 4 posts less.

> But Warp's post was a metapost (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MetaPost,
> thanks Don for that) or an attempt to hijack a thread that was about
> something he does not want anybody to discuss.

Would I be correct in suggesting that yours is than a meta-metapost?

Post a reply to this message