Darren New <dne### [at] sanrrcom> wrote:
> Interestingly, it was 
> upheld because profession isn't one of the things you're disallowed from 
> discriminating against.

  That sounds quite unconstitutional. Well at least by our constitution.

  Here you can't discriminate against anyone without a very good reason
which can be justified. Refusing to sell a house to someone because he is
a lawyer is certainly not such a good reason.

  (One could ask what would be a "very good reason which can be justified"
to discriminate against anyone. Well, one good example is movie casting:
If the movie needs a young man for a role, it's logical that they would
hire a young man, rather than an old woman.)

-- 
                                                          - Warp

Post a reply to this message