>> I have a secondary 180GB FAT32 partition
>
> That would be the biggest problem right there. FAT32 is really horrible
> on partitions that large.
I wasn't aware it *goes* that large.
I vaguely recall reading somewhere that to make FAT work on large
partitions, you make the cluster size larger or something weird like
that, which is probably not very efficient...
Post a reply to this message
|